Our thanks go to the following readers for the
following reasons.
First, to Glenn Lammi
over at the Washington Legal Foundation, who in
response to our Caronia Roundup, pointed out that WLF was having a Web Seminar
on the subject. Unfortunately, it was today. Too bad we didn’t get
around to posting this in time for the seminar. We'll try to be better next time.
Then there’s Calvert Crary, who sent us a PDF
of his Caronia analysis (which we
missed - even knowing about it we'll be damned if we can find it on the Web anywhere), which is interesting because it breaks down possible effects
of the decision by large branded, small branded, and generic companies. This is the only analysis that we’ve seen
that analyzes things this way.
Finally, thanks to Dr. John Duke (yes, some M.D.s
actually read the blog) an assistant professor at Indiana University MedicalSchool who
informs us of his study
discovering that there were more discrepancies between generic and branded labeling than we
thought, although most of them were quite minor. A word to the wise – this time our readers
in the generic business – since generic preemption is based on “sameness”
between generic and branded labeling, it would be a good idea not to risk your best defense but not having labels that actually are the
same.
1 comment:
Thank you for the shoutout Bexis. For those interested in watching the video, it will be available as an on-demand file by 2:00 tomorrow at www.wlf.org
Glenn Lammi, WLF
Post a Comment