AND NOW, this 26th day of March 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. . . .
The issue, slightly rephrased, is:
Whether this Court should replace the strict liability analysis of Section 402A of
the Second Restatement with the analysis of the Third Restatement.
In addition, the parties are directed to brief the question of whether, if the CourtTincher v. Omega Flex, No. 842 MAL 2012 (Pa. March 26, 2013).
were to adopt the Third Restatement, that holding should be applied prospectively or
It's about time.